Just Another Day on Lampedusa

At first I was very confused by the addition of this scene into the movie.  What does this fisherman/diver have to do with the refugees and migrants of the island of Lampedusa, but upon looking deeper into this scene and others like it you can see that this movie is not only about the migrants but the island as a whole.  The movie does not include any interviews with the people of Lampedusa but through this scene and those like it you can see the simple life that these people live. You can also see how the people just seem to go throughout their days as they normally would with no real acknowledgement of the migrants and hundreds of people dying right off their coast.  The fisherman and other people from Lampedusa talk only about their problems, bad weather not allowing them to go fishing and not being able to breathe due to anxiety. From first look this seems very selfish and you can see how entitled these people are but from further examination, ignoring these things might be the best thing for these Lampedusans as they are surrounded by death and can not do much themselves to change that fact or help the situation.  Instead of letting this situation overwhelm their lives, they just choose to go about their days whether that is productive in dealing with the migrant crisis is up to interpretation however I think it is a way for them to deal with this trauma.

 

Song and Performance Among Refugees

The above screenshot from Fire at Sea is taken from the scene of the film in which a Nigerian man and other refugees being processed are singing a song that tells the story of their journey.

Because the medium of the retelling is in the form of a song, it can be related to the broader theme of performance discusses previously in classes. Sung by refugees to the camera and the film’s audience, this song is a direct performance targeted at the viewer. It is more than a speech and is displayed in such a way as to stir emotions. Seeing that this is the goal of the film as a whole (stirring emotions and generating awareness for the conditions of refugees on the island), there should be no surprise as to why the film’s creators chose to include this scene in the final cut. It serves as a perfect example of performance within film, especially for a documentary.

Analyzing the shot in particular, the Nigerian man telling the group’s story is much closer to the camera compared to the rest of the singers. Taking approximately one quarter of the screen, he is the center of focus all while being at the side of the shot to simultaneously give the audience a feel of the rest of the room, along with the emotions and passion of the other refugees aboard.

This Boy’s Life

This documentary uses the life of a young boy on the island to compare to the dangerous lives of the refugees seeking asylum. Using footage from the boy at the doctor’s office versus seeing the doctor treat men off the boat let’s the viewers realize just how different these people have it than this privileged, untouched child. The little boy experiences shortness of breath from his anxiety while the people under the decks on ships cannot breathe due to the burning fumes that are present in the boat. Putting these experiences side-by-side reveals how much status, race, and socioeconomic status have a role in shaping the lives lived by people. The doctor is used as a vessel connecting these worlds so it is appropriate that the director include a scene with the boy at the doctor’s office.

Staying is Dying, but Leaving is Dying

In this clip, the viewer may be shocked at the cheerfulness and the cheerful tone that the refugees have when recounting their trip and the difficulties they faced, such as 200 people dying in the Sahara and having to drink their own urine to survive, on their way to Lampedusa. However, the cheerfulness and optimistic tone displayed in this scene is because the Nigerian refugees have accepted the reality that they may very likely die on their way to Lampeduas. In her book We Refugees, Hannah Arendt discusses how the Jewish refugees’ cheerfulness and optimism stemmed from an acceptance of death. This is similar the Nigerian refugees seen in this clip. The Nigerian refugee speaking in this clip states that “it is risky in life not to take a risk, because life itself is a risk.” The refugees use the fact that life is a risk as validation for accepting the 200 deaths of their companions in the desert, and for their own possible deaths on their trip to Lampedusa. Traveling to Lampedusa from Nigeria through Libya and the Sahara was risky and most likely many would die, but at the same time, it was a greater risk to stay in Nigeria and had a more likely chance of dying. Essentially, death was a real possibility for the refugees not matter what risk they chose, so they accepted the possibility of death and decided to head to Lampedusa.

Inept Aid: the inadequacy of physical help in a time of political crisis

This shot indirectly overlays the narrative of the refugee crisis in Lampedusa onto that of the locals in Gianfranco Rosi’s film Fire at Sea. Though we almost never see the two narratives intersect, the film makes known the presence of the refugees in the everyday lives of the Italian locals through subtleties such as symbolic imageryHere we see the Jack-o-lantern face of a cactus paddle with its gashes ineffectively covered with electrical tape. The two Lampedusan boys have just pummeled the group of cacti with stones, debris and firecrackers slung from their homemade sling shots. After their attack, the boys attempt to mend the cactus faces with tape that will not stick. This image symbolizes the plight of refugees who travel to Lampedusa, and the ineptitude of Italian attempts to help them. 

Firstly, the faces carved into the cactus paddle are foreign; they are human features forced onto parts of landscape. The cactus faces can therefore be taken to represent the arrival of African refugees at Lampedusa. Such a representation objectifies the refugees, raising an issue certainly worthy of discussion, but that cannot be fully covered within the scope of this post. Now, if we take this representation to be truethen we must also acknowledge that it is the Italian boys that destroy the faces, which suggests that the Italians are directly attacking the refugees when in fact this is not the case. Nevertheless, thfilm intends to show that no human (besides the oppressed themselfis innocent in a refugee crisis, even when they have committed no direct offense (recall The Doctor when he says that “It’s the duty of every human being to help these people).  

The sporadic application and peeling-off of the electrical tape suggests that the Italian efforts to save and heal the people who travel to Lampedusa are inadequateIn vain, the boys tend the wounds they have inflicted and leave the scene with naïve hope that their efforts will succeed. Likewise, Italians in the film work to save and help the people seeking refuge in Lampedusa, sending rescue vessels and offering medical care. But, as the film implies from the beginning and as The Doctor agrees, they cannot save everyone, and indeed many thousands die.

Further, Italian efforts place only a bandage over a fatal wound; no matter how many people they help on the ground, the greater problem lies within politics. People will continue to seek refuge and continue to suffer and die at sea while their situation at home remains constant. This idea is reflected in the still, as the tape merely covers the wounds of a dying plantLastly, it is significant that the ‘mouth’ of the cactus is covered, mirroring the silence the refugees face in this political uproar.

The Duality of the Soul

This clip depicts refugees singing together about their torment and pain as they remain in a state of transit in an attempt to flee their persecutors. Despite the director’s attempt to use this scene early in the film to paint the refugees as victims, this scene remains the most powerful depiction of humanity within the film. French philosopher Simone Weil, who starved to death while living under German occupation, believed that suffering causes the soul to cry out in two distinct voices. One voice which cries for relief, and the other which surrenders to the whims of a higher power. This scene is a beautiful and powerful depiction of the duality of the human spirit which Weil describes. These people are singing of their suffering to air their pain, but they do not beg for relief or for an answer. Through their painful song we see both a desire for an end to the suffering and insecurity, but we also see an acceptance of circumstance, and truth being felt by everyone who is singing. There are other scenes where people act more “normal”, but this is the only scene where people aren’t trying to ignore their circumstances, or ignoring their neighbors, or being depicted as helpless. Only in this scene do we see a deeper level to humanity, and emotional truth.

Popova, Maria. “How to Make Use of Our Suffering: Simone Weil on Ameliorating Our Experience of Pain, Hunger, Fatigue, and All That Makes the Soul Cry.” Brain Pickings, 14 Aug. 2016, www.brainpickings.org/2015/05/12/simone-weil-pain/.

 

Corrupt Officials Casablanca

In the scene building up to this clip, Rick and Captain Louis Renault (the local commanding police officer) discuss his next big arrest. Captain Renault is the prototypical corrupt police chief, who picks sides based on the highest bidder and own self-interests. Renault bolsters to Rick about how Major Strasser (the local Nazi leader) will be on hand to witness the arrest. The pair discuss “allegiances”, and the presence of two mysterious exit visas in Casablanca. Renault then tells Rick that there are rumors of a resistance fighter by the name of Victor Laszlo, who’s looking to obtain these exit visas. The clip begins with Renault proclaiming he must obey the orders of the Nazis, followed by Rick calling Renault a “GestapoSpank”. This slur perfectly describes the corrupt police officer, who is willing to undermine and oppress the refugees displaced in Casablanca at the time. Renault defends his position by saying that in Casablanca he is the master of his own fate.

This ties into the themes of refugees and transit. Throughout history, people in authoritative positions of power have been exploiting refugees in transit. Rick’s American Cafe, acting as the Refugee camp of today’s standard. Where just like today people prey upon the misplaced, desperate traveler. Abruptly one of Renault’s officers interrupts the two men, stating that Major Strasser has arrived. Renault’s demeanor clearly changes as he jumps to attention. The Clip closes with the Captain ensuring to the waiter that Major Strasser must receive the best possible seating. This clip portrays an all to familiar scene of an official in a “refugee zone” abusing their power and influence.

Perhaps Tomorrow

I find this clip to be very relatable to the migration crisis around the year 2015 in Germany. I had just happened to be studying abroad during this time and had to register as a temporary “citizen” so I saw firsthand the waiting times for people in Germany. This scene truly depicts the variety of ages, backgrounds, and different ethnicities(here a majority white refugees and in Germany a majority Middle Eastern refugees). The older generations waiting to escape the war and destruction with a tired and indifferent facial expression, simply trying to get by. On the other hand, the younger generations were filled with hope and eagerness to explore a new life in a new country. As the young woman says in the clip “Perhaps tomorrow we’ll be on the plane.” Unfortunately for many people who fled to Germany, they were stuck in such a massive wave of people that it just took too long so they had to create tent/slum-like areas to live in while they wait. This could be related to the cramped conditions you can see the people waiting in. The plane flying in the sky could be equated to the freedom that escape from the terrible conditions would bring. With all of this taken into consideration, I have found many parallels with the German immigration crisis.

Casablanca: Refuge of the Refugees

I chose this scene to blog about because I found that it fully encompassed the themes of refugees and movement within the film of Casablanca. With the help of narration, this clip shows the journey many Jewish Europeans had to take in hopes of fleeing Nazi-occupied countries they had previously called home. The background music and tone of the narrator expresses a sense of seriousness and urgency. I found the use of the map very interesting, especially how they showed the very path that many of the refugees fleeing Europe took. The director used these technical film elements to present themes of both risk and hope. I was completely unaware that Northern Africa became a place of transit for Jewish refugees during World War 2 so it was interesting new perspective to gain. The theory of liminality came to mind when watching this film because the refugees have traveled from far and wide, no longer in their country of origin, to Casablanca. Casablanca is portrayed as this waiting station, a purgatory if you will, in which people are waiting to receive the necessary paperwork to flee to the Americas. The narrator foreshadows this and the actual time in which people ended up waiting there in the clip I chose when he said “The others would wait in Casablanca where they would wait, and wait, and wait….”.

Your Number Please

This scene is particularly interesting in the terms of refugees and performance throughout the film.  To start this scene, Georg is playing the role of Weidel, the poet that died at the beginning of the movie.  Throughout the clip we see why it is important for him to play this role if he has any hopes of leaving this port town.  When he mentions the name Weidel he is immediately brought back to see a different man and given transit passes. This shows how corrupt the refugee process was and how one had to have money and know people if they ever wanted to get out.  If he had not known this person he would have been simply categorized and given to the next person to wait in line for like the other characters we see in the waiting rooms throughout the movie.  Another interesting part of this clip is the number that the worker is insisting on.  It is written on a small ripped up piece of paper and he requires to see it before saying anything.  When he does see the number he does nothing with it but throw it in a desk making it seem not important just another way to try and delay the process if people loose their number.

The camera angles in the clip switch pretty rapidly between shots of Georg’s face and the workers face allowing the audience to see everyone’s reactions but also create a tension on if his playing of Weidel is going to do anything for him or if he will be caught impersonating someone else.  This adds to the suspension of this scene both of the performance aspect but also what will come to the refugees and what processes do they have to go through.