Alone in a Field of White

These two images both showcase being lost and isolated in various forms.  Although the penguin in the top clip chose to walk away from his pack, he is still lost and destined for an unfortunate future as the researchers are not allowed to help him.  The researchers in the bottom clip are simulated being lost and caught in a storm that is not their choice. I think being lost is a common theme in this movie as most the people interviewed or talked about felt lost before they came to Antarctica and didn’t really have a home.  Some people were sneaking into other countries in sewer pipes even.

The scene with the penguin helps reveal why the researchers are there, there is a great unknown as to why some animals act the way that they do and why this animal would just get up and leave, a question many would ask why these researchers left their life to go to Antarctica.  These two shots also use varying camera angles that contrast the two pieces and feelings of being lost. In the first clip with the penguin they use a close up of the penguin when he is with the pack followed by very wide and long shots as he is walking into the abyss. With the researchers on the bottom there isn’t a big wide shot like the penguin that shows they are truly lost.  There are some wide shots but the frame is generally crowded and you don’t get the same feeling as the penguin alone with the backdrop of mountains.  This could be because the researchers are not truly alone.

A Human-Centered Nature Documentary?

Encounters at the End of the World is most assuredly a documentary, featuring interviews of real workers and scientists at a research center in Antarctica. From a certain lens, this film can be perceived as a nature documentary not because of the penguins and harsh, frozen landscape, but because of the humans at the center being observed so removed from their homes and the rest of society at large.

The first shot of the two above is a long shot reminiscent of those used when observing animals from afar in documentaries such as Planet Earth or Our Planet. Stefan Pashov, climbing down from the large piece of machinery, can be compared to a monkey in a tree or a lion in the middle of the African Savannah. The film wants the viewer to notice him as a subject, and this is what he does now; operating machinery is his new habitat in this almost case-study-like film.

In the second shot, William Jirsa is found and interviewed in a setting that does not initially become recognized as located in Antarctica. The gardens that surround him give the feel of a much more typically “natural” environment. The production crew also makes a point of keeping his awkward gestures, such as him scratching his nose, in the final cut of the documentary. This shot also reveals just how isolated the team is from the rest of society, as norms throughout the film seem to be different at the facility compared to the ones many of us practice at home. The awkwardness and social tension is incredibly thick both in this shot and in other areas of the film, which is part of what is being studied about them, as a typical nature film would showcase to you all of the interesting or odd social characteristics and behaviors of the animals under observation.

Do Not Disturb Nature

The film for this blog post, Inhuman Encounters at the End of the World, is not like any other film we have watched or analyzed in this class thus far. One important element and aspect that stood out to me while watching this film was the overall idea of not wanting to disturb nature. The scientist made it a point to mention their intent and full intention of not wanting to disturb the natural processes of nature within the animals while they study them. As this is a documentary type style that involves animals is was obviously nice to see and hear the good intentions of scientists in regard to their study of the animals. While most of the interactions in the film were positive and happy there were a few times that made me realize how nature isn’t always working with the animals in a positive manner. In the top picture, you see a penguin who has gotten off track with the rest of his group and will likely die as a result of this distract. The scientist and filmmakers stuck to their intentions of not wanting to interrupt the animals so they did not help the penguin to get back on track. While this was sad to see it served as a reminder and great example of what really happens in a penguin’s life.  The other photo shows scientists working with seals in hopes to learn more about their supply of milk. In doing so they mention that the technique in which they use causes very little harm and doesn’t really interfere with their day-to-day life.

Humans in Nature

The scenes that chose represent the theme of nature shown through the film “Encounters at the End of the World”. More specifically, I think the film really touches on how humans interact with nature and these scenes contribute to this theme. Herzog uses camera angles, lighting, and plots throughout the film to show us what is the right way that humans should interact with nature and what is the wrong way to interact with nature. In the first screenshot, the base that researchers live at. The scenes from the base seem gray and deary, I think this conveys that infiltrating nature is not something that we as humans should be doing. Other scenes in the film that are filmed at the base, the scenery all seem gray and drab. This is contrasted by the screenshot from the other scene at the very beginning of the film, where the researchers are looking at the ice in Antarctica, where the scene is vibrant and light. There are other moments where they are observing nature and there is a usage of color and light that contrasts the scenes from the base, such as when Herzog was interviewing the penguin researcher. This shows how humans should interact with nature, we as humans should observe and preserve nature, not try to infiltrate it or change it.