Video Essay Outline

Siena Fam

4/29/2020

LTGR – 270

Video Essay Outline

 

Slide 1: Intro:

Quentin Tarrantino uses his film, Inglorious Basterds, to critique America’s appropriation of Holocaust memory. The silenced American histories such as the genocide of Native Americans, the enslavement of African Americans, and the oppression of Jewish Americans have been displaced by an increasing Holocaust commemoration in the United States. This film uses a wide array of characters to represent different groups that have been discriminated against throughout history in order to rewrite historical events in a way that gives triumph and an alternate ending to oppressed populations both in Germany during WWII and historically in the United States.

Throughout this essay I will highlight six scenes that exemplified the intertwined and silenced histories exemplified within the characters that pertain to both German and American history.

 

Slide 2: Scene 1 – 21:21 – 24:12 – Lineup

The first scene shows Aldo Raine “Aldo the Apache”, “putting together a special team” of 8 Jewish American soldiers. He explains his argument that all Nazi’s must die, no Nazi is a good Nazi, “Nazi ain’t got no humanity. They’re the foot soldiers of a Jew-hating, mass-murdering maniac, and they need to be destroyed. That’s why any and every son of a bitch we find wearing a Nazi uniform, they’re gonna die”. He presents the comparison to Native American genocide and is using the victimization of the Native Americans to help them fight for Jewish liberation by using Native American resistance methods, “I am the direct descendant of the mountain man Jim Bridger. That means I got a little Indian in me. Our battle plan will be that of an Apache resistance.” References scalping of Native Americans in the Southeast to achieve the status of warrior and to appease the spirits of the dead. In turn, the whites would also practice scalping in response to Native American scalping and voices that, “When you join my command, you take on debit. That debit you owe me…personally. Each and every man under my command owes me 100 Nazi scalps…”. The use of Jewish American soldiers in the Basterds and the references to the victimization of Native Americans, an “Apache resistance”, and scalping is significant because it rewrites history to be in favor of those that were taken advantage of.

There is a personal aspect to the group, Aldo Raine is Native American and is avenging the genocide against them. The Basterds is a group of Jewish American soldiers who are fighting to avenge the hate and the stigmatization of their religion.

Camera angle –> The camera in these scene first is angled looking down at the group, with Aldo Raine entering from the right, the camera then moves in front of Aldo as he announces his intentions and introduces himself, the camera moves with Aldo from behind the soldiers and visualizes the significance and power Aldo Raine will hold within the film. The camera continues to switch between being behind the soldiers and behind Aldo as he is addressing them. As Aldo continues his speech about how the Germans will know the, they will talk about them, and they will fear them, you can see the soldiers and especially Donny Donowitz (Bear Jew), getting excited or rather amped up to begin their mission to kill Nazi’s. Tarantino shot on film to create an older medium of cinema relevant to the time period of the film, the colors are gray and dark because the subject of the film and this scene are dark and violent, about death and genocide.

 

Slide 3: Scene 2 – 26:27 – 38:00 – Woods

This is where we are first presented with the imagery of scalping, with the Basterds surrounding 3 remaining Nazi soldiers left, set in the woods in a large ditch. The imagery lets the viewer know that these 3 soldiers have no way out, the Basterds show no mercy. Aldo calls for the Nazi Sergeant to approach him, and the camera shows him walk in slo motion and looking around to show the surrounding Basterds and to create his feeling of despair. The Sergeant salutes Hitler before Aldo tells him to sit down. Aldo introduces Huge Stiglitz and the scene cuts, to return to Aldo saying, “Can I assume you know who we are.”- Sergeant – “You’re Aldo the Apache.” Raine tells the Sergeant, “Whether you leave this ditch alive is entirely on you…”. The location of a ditch is significant and ironic because it is historically where victims of genocide are left. Aldo asks the Sergeant for the location of another group of Nazi soldiers in an Orchard down the road, the Sergeant refuses. This is when Aldo Raine introduces Donny Donowitz, the “Bear Jew”. Aldo asks if the Sergeant knows who he is and the Sergeant responds, “He beats German soldiers with a club.” – Aldo – “He bashes their brains in with a baseball bat…”. Since the Sergeant refused to divulge information of Germans in an Orchard, Aldo calls the Bear Jew. The camera and imagery of this scene is shown going back and forth between the Sergeants face, the tunnel, Aldo, and the other two German soldiers. There is a knocking from the Bear Jew in the tunnel and his bat, creating suspense. The music played is godly yet dark and intimidating but as the Bear Jew emerges from the tunnel, war music plays. After the Bear Jew beats the Sergeant to death he starts cheering, as he’s stepping over the Sergeants body, “Teddy Fucking Williams knocks it out of the park! Fenway Park is on its feet for Teddy Fucking Ballgame! He went yard on that one! On to Lansdowne Street!”. This brings the American history of baseball, the German thought it was just a club but Aldo corrects him and says it is a baseball bat. The Bear Jews victory speech is referencing Boston baseball, this is significant because the northern United States is were slavery was first abolished and is a more progressive place on human rights historically in the US. After the Bear Jew beats the Sergeant, one of the Basterds shoots one of the soldiers and the last one remaining tells the Basterds the position of the other Nazi troop, how many there are, and the artillery they are carrying in order to save himself from being killed. The scene cuts to the survivor talking to Hitler who asks him if they marked him as they did the other survivors and the soldier says “yes”, the scene then cuts back to the woods where Aldo is talking to survivor about what he will do with his uniform, he says he will burn it, but that doesn’t bode well for the Basterds which is why they brand him with a Swastika. This branding is foreshadowing to the last scene with Hans Landa and Aldo Raine because we see Donny telling Aldo that he’s getting pretty good at that. Aldo confirms that, saying that it’s just practice.

 

Slide 4: Scene 3 – 56:12 – 59:45 – Hans Landa & Shosanna “Emmanuelle” meet again

This scene takes place during the lunch regarding moving the Nazi premier to Shosanna’s theater. He is talking about how the black man who works at the theater will not be able to operate the projector because the Reich Minister, “…wouldn’t want the success or failure of his illustrious evening dependent on the prowess of a n****…”, he says if the event is to be held at her theater, he will have to have nothing to do with it. Shosanna “Emmanuelle” and her black husband, Marcel,  are reminiscent of the racism and discrimination that related to slavery and segregation in the United States and Nazi Germany that are still prevalent today. It is ironic because in the end Marcel gets the last say because he is the one who lights the cigarette and burns down the theater. Another significance to this scene is that Hans Landa orders milk and crème during their conversation at lunch. The imagery when the crème comes and the camera switches from the spoon scooping to the plate, spoon scooping to the plate, reminds the audience of the first scene and how Hans Landa killed Shosanna’s family on the dairy farm and that she is Jewish hiding from the Nazis yet is brought into business with them.

 

Slide 5: Scene 4 – 1:25:00 – 1:27:10  – Operation Kino, in the basement with unexpected Major playing game

During Operation Kino three of the Basterds are undercover as Nazi’s with Bridget Von Hammersmark in the basement tavern and they are unexpectedly accompanied by a Nazi Major in the bar, they begin playing a game like Heads Up. The Major is ironically King Kong, his guessing game resembles both the story of King Kong and American slavery,  “So… my native land is the jungle, I visited America, but my visit was not fortuitous for me, but the implication is that it was for somebody else. When I went from the jungle to America, did I go by boat?” – “Yes” – “Did I go against my will?” – “Yeah” – “On this boat ride, was I in chains?” – “Yeah” – “When I arrived in America, was I displayed in chains?” – “Yes” – “Am I the story of n**** in America?” – “No” – “Well, then, I must be King Kong.” – “Yes!”. This scene is significant because the story of King Kong is based on that of American slavery.

 

Slide 6: Scene 5 – 2:23:20 – 2:23:52 – Shosanna’s film message during premier

Shosanna’s “message to Germany” during the Nazi premier presents the significance of point of view to the film, the point of view of Shosanna’s face above the Nazi’s, stealing their power, and reversing the premier’s efforts in propaganda. The imagery of Shosanna’s giant face on the screen before the theater is burned down shows the extent of revenge deserved for the Jewish people. This was Shosanna, a Jewish women’s plan, and Marcel, a black man, is the one who threw the cigarette that caused the fire. This offers an alternate ending to avenge racism, genocide, and discrimination against Jewish and African populations who were discriminated against in both the US and Germany. Having Shosanna’s face on the big screen gives her the power of propaganda rather than the Nazi film that was premiering. When Marcel throws the cigarette, the slow motion imagery of the cigarette flying is heart stopping, because the viewer knows that if this were to happen in real life the war would have ended. This scene shows the effort Tarantino makes in trying to give an alternate ending to populations victimized both in WWII and Nazi Germany but in US history as well.

 

Slide 7: Scene 6 – 2:27:00 – 2:29:37 – last scene with Hans Landa, Hermann, Aldo Raine, and Utivich in woods

When Landa officially surrenders to Raine, Utivich puts Landa in handcuffs and Raine shoots Hermann, who Utivich then scalps. Raine explains he is the only one his superiors need and tells him he made a good deal to end the war and that he layed out a pretty good life for himself post-war in the US.  Raine’s little speech about how well Landa has layed out a life for himself post-war and that he understands that one day Landa will be taking off his SS uniform. Taking off his SS uniform will allow him to dissolve back in to society, silencing his history as a ruthless SS officer. This is when and why Raine brands Landa with a Swastika, and remarks to Utivich, “This might just be my masterpiece.” The last camera angle is facing up at Utivich and Raine, promoting the importance of point of view and showing how the Jewish, American, Native American, and African populations came out on top and were avenged with this last scene. The scene is again, giving ethnicities who were taken advantage of a fantasy of coming out on top. This scene reverses the roles between enemy and victim. The camera in this scene focuses strictly on the characters left, because the war is over the last thing to address is Hans Landa. Before when the Basterds branded someone they didn’t show it, but they show Raine branding Landa, signifying the reversal of roles. The last angle faces up at Utivich and Raine, showing them on top. This is where Raine says that this just might be his masterpiece, coming full circle to the scene in the woods where we are first introduced to Aldo’s practicing of branding.

 

Slide 8: Conclusion

Through Tarrantino’s revision of historical events he promotes recognition to America’s reluctance of confronting its past of the genocide of Native Americans, the enslavement of African Americans, and the oppression of Jewish Americans. He utilizes Americas Holocaust commemoration by exploiting Americas own violent history through the characters in the film and how each of them contribute a story or plot to rewriting history to avenge racism, genocide, and discrimination seen in silenced American and German histories. The film offers oppressed populations a chance to reverse roles between enemy and victim.

 

 

Media Habits

Before COVID-19, I definitely did not use media as much as I do now. I usually only watched shows on Netflix and Hulu. I am too lazy to start watching new shows again so I pretty much would just rotate between Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Broad City, That 70s Show, and Schitt’s Creek. I also did not have as much time with physically being in school, having a job, and being able to hangout with friends to be watching more than 3 hours of media a day. When I’m at school I usually watch media in the afternoon or night time when I’m trying to relax.

Since COVID-19 hit, the amount of media I have consumed has drastically increased. I’ve been watching a lot more movies and watching new shows rather than the ones I usually watch in rotation. Since being home I’ve begun watching shows on different platforms like Amazon Prime and Disney Plus, because my family has accounts. My mom and I have begun watching movies every night because we have nothing else to do. School being online has also played a role in the increase in media I’ve been consuming. Online school makes it easy to watch shows in between assignments as a “break”. Not having a job or going to school or being able to see friends really leaves a lot more time to lay in bed, watch a show, and do nothing.

I think it’s incredible that we have the internet during such a crucial time period. Things would be so much worse if people were not able to work from home or we were not able to go to school online. The internet is providing entertainments for billions of people in the world quarantining and I think this whole pandemic would be much different if we did not have the internet. The internet is changing right now to normalize (as much as possible) billions of peoples lives during this time. I think we are now realizing how useful the internet is as a resource.

Attempted Understanding

This scene is when Joy’s “boyfriend” at the time took her to see this women who is working with some sort of organization towards resolving the sex trade. Joy is expressing her concerns about not being allowed to stay in Germany if she where to give more information. She expresses how she is worried that they will be sent back to their home countries where they will be in a lot of danger for themselves, their families, their madame’s families, and the Juju Priest. It’s hard for these two Germans to understand the situation Joy is in and actually be able to help her.

During this scene I recognized the camera angles as trying to help tell the story. Joy is trying to explain what could potentially happen and is trying to find a way to get help without getting anyone hurt. The camera is held from behind or to the side of Joy when she is talking in order to accentuate that this is about her. The two Germans are seen trying to understand by being shown from an angle behind Joy like in the still above. They also do the same thing with Joy’s “boyfriend” as he is listening and trying to understand what a Juju Priest is.

I think this scene is all about trying to understand the culture in which Joy and this industry has come from. Later in the film when Joy’s “boyfriend” offers her money to come live with him and pay off her debt, he still doesn’t understand that it is not that easy and she has other people to worry about.

Locals and Migrants

The film, Fire at Sea, encapsulates life for migrants and locals on the small island of Lampedusa. Throughout the documentary this song, “Fire at Sea”, is played at the beginning of the film on the radio and again is shown in the radio station at the very end. We learned in class later that this song has been known around the island for many years and is a reminder to locals of war and gunfire seen in the sea from land, looking as if there was fire at sea. I believe the title of the documentary is referencing this war and also how the migrants are fighting for their lives to make it to shore for a new life. This scene reiterates the meaning of the song and the title of the movie, using thunder as sound in the background made the story feel as though it were coming to life for the little boy. The woman explains how the ships fired rockets and it was as if there was fire at sea, the sea “turned red”. After she is finished talking, the scene cuts to the ocean and shows ships. At the end, the little boy is shown pretending to shoot into the ocean. I find this scene significant to the title of the film because it again connects the locals on land to the migrants fighting for a new life somewhere in the ocean.

Ideal Truth

I chose to compare these two scenes because I think they interchange relationships between humans and animals and the idea of truth. In the first still, the penguin knows his truth and has decided he will waddle his way into central Antarctica to certain death. They state in the film that there would be no use in trying to stop this penguin because he would most certainly make his way back to the exact spot. In the second still, scientists have their ears to the ice trying to listen to hypnotic seal sounds. The scientists have instruments they use to listen to the seal sounds, which resemble that of science-fiction noises. The imagery of these scientists listening to the ice gives more light to the idea of a world on the other side, which can be said of the same for the penguin in the first still, he is wandering into a new, unknown, world. I suggested the interchange between human and animals because the penguin in the first still is very determined to exhume his truth while the scientists are using more animal like tactics (never mind the instruments) by laying on the ice listening for seal sounds. The ideas of many different worlds comes from Herzog’s belief that truth can be fabricated through poetic and artistic choices.

A Flash of the Past

via GIPHY

This scene is at the very end of the movie when the family is leaving their small village in Turkey as well as their beloved grandfather behind. I think this scene shows how the film came full circle. Cenk, as the youngest in the family, is trying to imagine and replay the stories Canan had been telling him of their family and journey to Germany. This film follows the history of guest workers but, more specifically, the story of this certain family. This scene shows the memory, history, and cultural identity that was important to this family during the time of their migration and within the many generations that followed.

Inescapable Pasts

I chose to use this scene to make a meme of because it shows the reverse of roles, power, and memory at the end of the war. I wrote, “You can take the Nazi out of Germany but you can’t take the Swastika off his forehead”, because this is the scene where Hans Landa is surrendering to Aldo Raine. He says he will give up information and help them end the war as long as he is pardoned for his crimes and free to flee to Nantucket. The symbolism of the Swastika, the Inglorious Basterds, and the mentions of the “Bear Jew” throughout the movie all represent communicative memory. In the film, Aldo Raine knows that as soon as the war is over Nazi’s who have not been caught or killed will be able to shed their uniforms and dissolve back into society. This is exactly what Hans Landas plans to do when he arrives in Nantucket. When the Basterds catch Nazi’s they have two choices; refuse to give up information and be killed or give up information and become branded forever. The symbolism of carving Swastika’s on foreheads in the film represents the Nazi’s betrayal to their party but also leaves them with something to remind them everyday of the horrors they inflicted on others.

Length of Liminality – Casablanca

During this scene in the film Casablanca we see many refugees being detained and brought to the House of Justice in Casa Blanca. In the context of the film, this scene shows the uncertainty and risk of trying to escape Europe as a refugee during World War II. Within this scene officers are detaining refugees because of invalid or a lack of letters of transit which allow one to travel freely around German-occupied Europe and to neutral Portugal, these letters are especially valuable to those stranded in Casablanca with hopes of making it to Portugal and the New World.

From the opening scene the narrator shows movement by showing the journey many took to flee Nazi-occupied Germany. The usage of the map shows technical elements used by the director in order to employ a sense of hope for a new life as well as risk in finding this new life. The theme of refugees is prominent throughout the whole film as it is about the journey many refugees attempted during World War II. The film follows along with the refugees voyages as they navigate their way through and out of Casablanca. Liminality encircles this film as the refugees in Casablanca have fled their countries of origin and are now awaiting a transition to a new status they will hold when their journey is complete. Casablanca is liminality central in this film.

Over-all I especially found this scene interesting because of the ending. A man who tries to run from the cops but is shot down in front of a sign that reads, “I keep my promises. Even those of others”. In his hand they find a poster I believe to be French propaganda against the Nazi’s as the poster reads, “Free France”. I think this scene foreshadows the loyalty and faithfulness people have to their beliefs and countries.

 

Who’s Running the Show?

This scene stuck out to me during the film because it is the moment everyone realizes that they’ve lost control. It shows the uncertainty and helplessness the characters feel after the war sirens went off and the first bombs were dropped on Poland. I understand that this film is supposed to be ironic and hypocritical but I think this particular still contains a lot of irony in itself. The line, “The Nazis are putting on the show now — a much bigger one”, portrays their loss of power over the situation and also states that now this show/film is being put on/will be about the Nazis. In this still, the performers from the play are hiding. The characters they’re playing were powerful, high-titled people during their lives which makes it ironic that they’re now hiding from war.

What I found interesting about this still is the foreshadowing it is casting on the performers. The image that they are all squeezed in hiding and scared portends their possible future as refugees once the war hits Poland harder. This also could be foreshadowing a rise in the resistance, it could be portending a secret meeting between resisting Poles. This scene discloses a lot of different things which can be taken in multiple ways, but we can be sure that this still reveals unification amongst Poles against Nazis during this time as well as the new distribution of power to the Nazi regime.