“This State is poised to become the first to ban foam food Packaging”

News Report 

  1. Title of my News Report and article:
    1. “This State is poised to become the first to ban foam food Packaging”
      1. Found on National Geographic
      2. Written by Laura Parker
  2. My citation for my article is as follows:
    1. Parker, Laura. “This State Is Poised to Become the First to Ban Foam Food Packaging.” Maryland Is Poised to Become the First State to Ban Foam Food Packaging, National Geographic Society, 5 Apr. 2019.
  3. Here is a direct link to my article:
    1. www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/04/maryland-styrofoam-food-packaging-ban/
  4. The 5 W’s and How:
    1. What: Maryland is anticipated to become the first state to ban the distribution of single-use foam containers for food production (i.e. for take-out orders/leftovers in restaurants and businesses – however, meat packaging would be allowed). The bill is still awaiting approval from the Governor, but apparently only has about six days to decide, and he has made no indication as to what side he will be voting towards. Del. Brooke Lierman has been waiting for the success of the House of Delegates to have enough votes to veto the Governor for the last three years; she was quoted that she feels that the community has reached a “tipping point” and is ready for a change when it comes to helping out the environment.
    2. Who: Del. Brooke Lierman, along with a vote of 100-37 of the House of Delegates in Maryland voted to pass the bill, while they now await Gov. Larry Hogan’s decision on whether to pass the bill or veto it (*hint: either way, they already have enough votes to override the veto).
    3. When: The article came out on April 5th, 2019. It said that the Governor had just six days to make his decision about the bill, however, when I give the News Report presentation (Wed April 10th), he should only have one day remaining, and the official results should be found out very soon. If the bill is passed it will go into official affected the following summer (June/July 2020).
    4. Where: Maryland
    5. Why: The citizens are pushing for this bill, because they feel that the ban on foam, single-use containers is a significant first step toward becoming a more sustainable and environmentally-friendly community. They understand that these products do not go away and thus end up causing pollution elsewhere, and they are striving to be one of the first states in the country to break this cycle.
    6. How: The group of state delegates voted for the bill, and came out with a 100-37 vote in its favor for it to be passed. Now, once it is passed, changes must be put into place by local businesses as they look for take-out food container alternatives.
  5. Impact:
    1. For my News Report, I chose to examine how the passing of this ban would have impacts in three ways:
      1. Environmentally
        1. If the containers were banned, the number of non-recyclable and single-use items would decrease in the community
          1. This would mean an overall decrease in pollution/litter not only seen within the state of Maryland, but in the waters on the east coast (as our garbage always makes its way there eventually)
      2. Economically
        1. Because the number of pollutants and litter would decrease, this mean less money would need to be spent by the government and locals picking it up and trying to find ways to dispose of it
        2. The article mentioned that small business owners may struggle if this law was passed because foam is very inexpensive and efficient
          1. Spending more of their costs on an alternative could hurt them
      3. Socially
        1. The law could bring people in the community together
          1. Many see it as a victory, as they have been striving for a common goal, and want to continue to work toward living sustainably
        2. The law could divide people in the community
          1. Small business owners could turn against those that voted in favor of the bill, because they feel they are going to take a hit financially because of the ban
  6. Relevance to ENVT 200:
    1. Sustainability
      1. The 3 E’s (Environmental, Social, and Economic)
    2. Systems Thinking
      1. Can look at how the law getting passed has several both pros and cons in different eyes of the beholders
    3. Ethics/Value
      1. Restaurant and business owners are forced to take a look at what they are providing their consumers and make sure they are telling the truth and not breaking the new law if it passes
    4. Policy
      1. Gov. Larry Hogan still remains on the fence (at this point) about the bill and still has to vote (enough delegate votes to overrule a veto)
  7. Questions:
    1. What happens if the governor vetoes it?
      1. Does this show he is not supporting what the majority of his citizens are striving toward? How will they react?
    2. Will local businesses comply? What true economic impacts will they feel? What changes and alternatives will they choose to make?
    3. If passed, what will the next environmentally-friendly law look like for Maryland?

Event

For my second blog post, I decided to go to an event. The event I went to was “Unlearning and healing from Racism”. The event was mostly as the name shows, understanding and learning about racism. A quick description of the event is as follows: Upon arriving, we did a quick ice breaker. Talking to the people around us and telling them facts about ourselves that you would not guess by looking at me. After we spoke with the people around us, we were shown two videos, which had interesting meanings. After this, we were split up by race, taking POC and putting them in one room and non POC in another room. We discussed that later this was to help make POC and non POC of color to talk and not have to worry about how it would affect the other. (But, in the end the two groups did meet back up and discuss). During the split, we then watched another video. The next activity we did was really interesting, and I did enjoy it, there were three sections on the floor: red (uncomfortable), yellow (semi) and green (very). And, we were asked questions and had to gage how comfortable we were with the topic and how comfortable we were on speaking about the topic as well. I enjoyed the activity and the way it was set up, letting the induvial really reflect how comfortable they are, with pretty complex racial issues and topics. It was a good way to gage the room and the level of comfort among the people, but a key point of the night was the we were supposed to feel discomfort. The more group-based discussion happened after this activity, actually turning the whole room into a circle and having really in-depth discussion about topics that were prewritten for starters. Getting to listen to other peoples and opinions about the questions, and how certain things should be handled, especially situations that I was always unsure of. A topic that was discussed during the event that really has stuck with me, is the idea of holding space instead of taking up space. Instead of talking and trying to lead things, we should just listen and hold the space we have instead of being active in it. It was a powerful thing to learn, but not as powerful as hearing the questions that the POC students had written for the non POC students to listen to and reflect on. I can definitely understand how this event can relate to our first course student learning outcome. The relation between environment studies and the impacts of racism, either it be how the government does not want to help the poorer communities during disaster times. Or how the epa who, is supposed to be unbiased rather help richer neighborhoods where more tax dollars come from, compared to poorer neighborhoods, who really need the support and help do not get it. It is an act of environmental racism essentially.  So, though this program I really got a better understanding as how to handle certain situations as a non POC. It was really eye opening and I highly recommend anyone to go if there is ever another event like this.

Help Stop Folly Beach Land Swap and Risky Beachfront Development!

Citations:

Primary article used:

SCELP Cases: Folly Super Beach Front Lots – Avulsion. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://scelp.org/projects/view/130

Johnson, C. (2019, March 28). Folly Beach land swap raises concerns about city’s environmental lawsuit. Retrieved from https://www.postandcourier.com/news/folly-beach-land-swap-raises-concerns-about-city-s-environmental/article_26bb6234-50a1-11e9-a5da-db117ac95188.html

Additional article used:

https://www.change.org/p/stop-folly-beach-land-swap-and-risky-beachfront-development

_____

The questions: who/what/when/where/why/how

The South Carolina Environmental Law Project filed a lawsuit on February 12th against private landowners. They want to challenge the landowners who took artificial renourished  land and claimed it as there own. It is a big debate between whether are not this should be allowed, because the “South Carolina’s Public Trust Doctrine, the state owns all land below the average high-water mark and keeps this land in trust for the benefit of all the citizens of the state. When private property borders a shoreline, the boundary between public trust property and private property is not fixed.” (https://scelp.org/projects/view/130). Recent news reported that the City of Folly Beach wants to do a land swap with the private landowners.  This raised concerns to other residents on Folly Beach because they do not want another unsustainable home on Folly Beach.

 

Impact/Relevance to our class

If the land swap does not occur there is a likely hood that there could be another “super beach front” lot on Folly. These houses are built because people want to make a quick and easy profit with this land. Meaning that the houses that are being built are made quickly and without thinking of the long term effects. Folly Beach is already eroding quickly and with sea level rising it is only going to get worse. Folly Beach citizens began a petition to the land swap because it goes against what Folly Beach stands for and that is saving the sand-starved beach. This is relevant to our class in many different ways. it deals with sea level rising from the cause of climate change and pollution from the houses that can cause greater contamination to our oceans.

 

Why I chose this article

This article I chose, because I personally wanted to know what is going on in Charleston. I do not live on folly, but I does frequently visit it as do many residents and tourist. Folly Beach is a home that is eroding quickly and the community is trying everything to help slow it down.  In class we have talked about sea level rise due to climate change is already affecting coastal cities. Many people find it hard to believe that is already happening here locally. I wanted to raise awareness of how building these “super beach front” lots will only damage us in the long run. Putting more pollutions into our waterways and the possibility of the septic tank overflow that will contaminate the area locally. Although many people are not from Charleston, you, students still go to school here making this your second home. Signing the petition I showed in class will help stop this from happening in the future as well. I will also link it here below if you did not get a chance in class.

The petition website:

http://chng.it/NQHPSrk9Fn

 

Citizen Science Litter Pick Up

CofC’s Office of Sustainability does a litter clean up every few weeks while using an app made by the SC Aquarium to collect data. I volunteered to participate in a litter pick up on March 8th and spent around an hour collecting debris from the corner of Calhoun and Coming. I partnered up with one of the OoS interns to take turns collecting trash and logging items in the app. Once you download the app you have to join “projects” for what exactly you’re doing because it’s a citizen science platform that many groups use to track different environmental or biological concerns. The OoS uses “litter-free digital journal” to log the items they pick up. The app categorizes the litter by composition and has options for the user to specify if the given categories don’t match.

In 1 hour, my partner and I collected around 317 individual pieces of litter. Most of these were cigarette butts or tobacco related debris. Because of the location where we collected trash, that wasn’t surprising as it’s a pretty busy street and has lots of foot traffic and there’s a short brick wall at the corner of a lot where people sit and smoke. There were fresh cigarette buts that were still round and orange but we also found lots of old butts that looked like dirty cotton balls picked apart. This corner would probably be a good spot for a cigarette butt receptacle, I’ve even heard of ones that are made using recycled butts.

The next most abundant litter were microplastics. There’s street parking pretty much all along where we collected trash, and there were little rigid fragments that looked like someone smashed their mirror on something, so we picked that up as well as a lot of other tiny plastics like pen caps or buttons. The 3rd most abundant litter was paper and cardboard, most of which was food related. These were mostly things like gum wrappers, straw wrappers, receipts and little scraps of paper.

This is the second litter clean up I’ve done using a Citizen Science app, and it was my first with CofC’s OoS! It was a fun way to be involved with other CofC students interested in conservation while picking up trash that would end up in our waterways otherwise. I like both apps but its nice that this one gives you an option to specify what exactly you’re finding, which also provides better data for the people reviewing the findings.

Citizen Science

For my second blog post, I decided to participate in a citizen science clean-up project. My roommate and I had already planned on going to the Hazel Parker Playground’s dog park located on East Bay Street, which is part of our regular weekly routine. I thought it would be the perfect opportunity to take some bags and gloves and pick up litter.

I didn’t suspect the amount of trash I would find in such a small vicinity. As soon as I started my clean-up, first finding a bottle cap and an old newspaper, I ended up collecting one thing after another. It was shocking to find so much trash in such a short amount of time. I visit the dog park at least three times a week and it always appeared relatively clean and kept-up with. This project helped me realize that litter is so prominent, especially in the areas that I frequently visit and pass by. Because it’s not something I’m actively looking for, I often find myself overlooking this immense issue. It’s unfortunate that it took this project to truly open my eyes to the problem, but I’m happy that I decided to do it. It was also encouraging that my roommate was so willing to help me walk around and collect the trash.

I found myself feeling optimistic while picking up the litter. It almost became a sort-of game; picking up one wrapper and then spotting and running to another piece of trash to collect. Although I was only working and focusing on a relatively small space, it still felt empowering to feel like I was making at least a small difference in the community. Other people at the park spotted my roommate and I walking around and picking up the waste and proceeded to ask us what we were doing out of curiosity. After explaining my intentions, they were all encouraging and positive about our actions. This also contributed to my optimism, because maybe at least one other person had walked away with the urge to make a difference. Picking up litter can be as easy as just spotting something on the ground on your walk to class. Waste is unfortunately all over our community, but if we all adapt the mindset that change can be accomplished with action, we could definitely see big changes.

This activity connects to our class because it highlights the importance of cleaning up and contributing to our community and environment. We’re all aware that litter is detrimental to our ecosystems. Especially since we’re so close to the coast, floating trash can negatively impact species and wildlife. Within about 10 minutes of walking around, I alone picked up 11 different paper/cardboard debris, 2 plastic caps and a lid, an empty cigarette pack, and a few more various items. A good amount of the trash I collected was embedded in leaves and even stuck in the fences surrounding the park. It’s frustrating to know that there are those who aren’t as conscious of their actions or impacts on the environment. Hopefully with more awareness and knowledge about this issue, change is inevitable.

Spring Break in Ecuador!

Medlife is a non-profit organization that has multiple chapters around the world; the College of Charleston happens to have a chapter which I am a part of. Medlife stands for medicine, education, and development for low-income families everywhere. The mission of this organization is “to build a worldwide movement empowering the poor in their fight for equal access to healthcare, education, and a safe home.” Their vision is “a world free from the constraints of poverty.” For spring break this year a group of 23 CofC Medlife members traveled to Ecuador to work in remote medical mobile clinics. This trip related to all three pillars of sustainability: environment, society, and economy.

The mobile clinics were located in rural communities, that have limited access to everything. The people living in the communities live about 30 minutes up a mountain, believe it or not, most of them did not have any form of transportation other than their own two feet. The people in these communities are living a minimalist lifestyle, and have been their entire lives. The majority of the patients that we encountered were older than 60 years old and spoke either Spanish or Quechua. The members of the communities worked in the field everyday, and had multiple animals to maintain the farm and carry heavy things from point A to point B. The villages that we visited were located in the central part of Ecuador, in a city called Riobamba. It was the first time ever seeing a doctor for many of the patients that we saw. All of the children that came to the clinics had to be taught how to brush their teeth, and were given a toothbrush with toothpaste, because they did not own any. The older patients suffered from arthritis, due to working the fields everyday. Almost all of the patients that came to the clinics suffered from intestinal parasites, due to the lack of clean water. This trip really opened my eyes, because we take having clean water for granted to drink or even brush our teeth.

On one of our days there, we participated in a project day. The project day consists of going into the communities and asking them what their community needs. Some of the projects that Medlife does in these communities are building bathrooms in schools, building a house for a patient, or creating a stairway up a steep hill. The project that were tasked with was to paint the stairway that had been completed by a previous Medlife chapter. The goal of the project is to have the community remain sustainable. Medlife offers the financial resources that have been donated, while the community offers the labor and maintenance of the community project. Although, not having much to their name, they were wealthy. One does not need to have money to be wealthy. The people of Ecuador are wealthy in other ways, they have a rich culture, and are unified as one.

After this trip to Ecuador, I feel more connected to the natural world than before my trip. I always had an interest in the beauty of nature, but the beauty of what I’ve seen in America is completely different from the beauty of Ecuador. My connection to the natural world has changed over time, after becoming open to learning more about the Earth and the impact that humans have on it. My connection also began to strengthen after I started traveling more often. Every time I travel my mind is blown by how beautiful life is and how amazing God’s creation is. It is important to be connected to the natural world, because without nature we would have nothing. Now that technology has taken over the world, people have become disconnected with not only nature, but with other people; its a shame that we are living in a world that revolves around having wifi. After visiting the villages, it really resonated the fact that people can live a happy life without having technology. If anyone ever has the opportunity to travel to Ecuador, I highly recommend it!

These are some of my favorite pictures that I took while in Ecuador…

Documentary blog post

I have decided to review a documentary called “Blue Planet II: Big Blue.” This documentary is available for anyone to watch on Netflix and is in my opinion, one of the best documentaries for younger people who want to get a better idea of what is in and what is happening with our oceans. This documentary shows a plethora of species and their special behavioral patterns that may not be known that they do to the regular everyday human. These patterns shown show spectacular brilliance in certain species that could be lost if we do not help prevent the continuous poisoning of our oceans through waste and pollution.

This documentary includes the behavior patterns of dolphins and also their intelligence in thorough detail. It shows how the porpoises use anemones and other plants as a personal way of protecting themselves from infection with the special antibodies in the anemones. It also shows many other animals and how they survive through their special patterns of migration and ways of predation that are very fascinating. The documentary shows how orcas temporarily stun groups of fish by their violent tail flaps that stun the fish long enough for them to be eaten without trouble. It also does not only focus on the animals in the ocean, it also shows coastal birds like the wandering albatross. These birds are the largest of any living bird of the present day, and because of the overfishing of seas, the albatross has to work much harder than before to find food for themselves and for their offspring so that they can continue to be a species on this planet. They may spend up to a year continuously looking food for themselves and also ingest plastics which are poisons to their diets. This is a continuous problem and will continue to be a problem if we do not step up as humans to fix our planet.

The filmmakers who produced this documentary are definitely trying to push a conservationist agenda to the audience, and doing so in a way that shows the beauty of our earth and why we should work harder to fix these issues. Possible biases in this documentary could be that the filmmakers did not show any positives that are going on in our economic world today, and focused primarily on making the film about how we have not been doing our jobs recently and how we can improve our earthly situation, rather than show positive ways that we have already been working on bettering our world. All in all, I very much enjoyed this documentary and it was displayed in a way that was more fascinating rather than a bore to watch, and I believe that this documentary could be shown to many other audiences that would say the same thing. This film made me think much harder about conservation, and also made me think much more deeply about just how fascinating our earth really is, and why we should work much harder to sustain it and have this beauty be able to be seen by future generations.

Reflection on personal change

Nearing the end of the semester I find myself actively considering my actions so much more than I ever did previously.  Before taking this and another environmental course this semester, I had never had much education regarding sustainability and environmental concerns beyond a general approach.  It was never actively on my mind when I would go shopping or go on late night drives just for fun.  Now, when I go to shopping, I am always recognizing how much waste we produce, how everything in grocery stores is plastic, how much I feel the need to buy when I go shopping for “back to school”, etc…

What really opened my eyes to this was the Carbon Footprint activity and the “Story of Stuff” video we watched.  These two lessons, amongst many others, flipped a switch in my head that made me want to take steps in my own life to help our community and ultimately our planet.  The Carbon Footprint activity made me realize how much nonsense driving I do, just because I like to drive.  I have reduced my driving so substantially that I hardly ever take it out of the driveway.  The “Story of Stuff” opened my eyes to my shopping patterns and the speed at which I go through clothing.  I have always loved shopping and clothing, but have been much more aware of what I buy and how I buy it.  I’ve learned new concepts regarding how fast fashion is far from ecofriendly, which is something I probably would have never thought about while shopping in the past.  Even things as simple as when I go to the grocery stores, I bring reusable bags for myself and my friends as well.  I encourage late night walks instead of drives, as that had always been something my friends and I would do for hours on end to clear our heads.  By making it apparent to my friends that I care about this issue, I feel both encouraged to keep sharing what I learn as well as keep taking these steps to hold true to my word.  By making an active effort with my friends to act on these issues, I feel like they hold me accountable for my own as well so I don’t come across as hypocritical.

Although these actions are very simple and seem like they won’t make a huge difference, they are so easy to do everyday that it makes me wonder why anyone wouldn’t.  I am planning to continue taking steps towards a greener future for myself, and taking courses to educate myself on what I can do further.  Gradually adding different approaches to living, shopping, traveling, etc. is easy and has the ability to rub off on people as well!  Something that has made these actions so easy to remember and carry out is being in a city like Charleston where I frequently see different activities going on promoting a more sustainable lifestyle, different policies coming to be to create change, and people sharing their thoughts and ideas on how to make Charleston a better, greener space.

Blog Post #2: Personal Change

Throughout this semester I have seriously been trying to cut down on my plastic usage. For the last couple of years I have been somewhat conscious of my plastic usage, but this semester I have really been trying to use the smallest amount of plastic possible. Throughout my transition to less plastic it has been extremely fulfilling to know that I am making a difference in the worlds emissions and pollution problems. It is also difficult because my roommate uses an extremely large amount of single use plastic items and just refuses to change his ways no matter how much I lecture him. He grew up in a household where they used a large amount of single use plastics so he just does not know any other way and just struggles with changing. It is hard to have all these single use plastic items in our house and kitchen and avoiding them, but it has progressively gotten easier for me to not be tempted to use those items.     

 

I have learned from this experience that it is astounding how many people and restaurants use single use plastics. A large amount of restaurants give people straws without even ask their customers. Also a majority of restaurants use plastic cups or lids rather than compostable materials. Having so many restaurants which only have single use plastic options makes it extremely difficult to avoid plastic usage completely, but I have been able to reduce my plastic use significantly. Every time I have had the option of using plastic or avoiding it I have chosen to not use it, but so many restaurants bring drinks out with straws without even asking you. This resulted in me thinking that at times I was failing in avoiding plastic use, but I have to realize that those instances are not my fault. I think I will be able to keep reducing my plastic use, it is just difficult to completely avoid using plastic. For example gatorade only comes in plastic bottles so it is essential impossible to avoid plastic use there, but usually I reuse my gatorade bottles.I have also cut down on my gatorade consumption since cutting down on my plastic use. My oldest brother is extremely environmentally focused and he just recommended that I drink water from a reusable bottle and then only drink other drinks that are not put in plastic bottles. It is also just small things you have to give up, like not using plastic coffee stirrers and small tedious things like that make the whole process of cutting down on plastic difficult.  

What the Green New Deal Will Mean for Your Hamburger…

Citations:

Primary article used:

Dutkiewicz, J. (2019, March 07). What the Green New Deal will mean for your hamburger | Jan Dutkiewicz. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/07/green-new-deal-clean-meat-hamburger

Additional article used:

Pierre-louis, K. (2019, March 08). No One Is Taking Your Hamburgers. But Would It Even Be a Good Idea? Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/08/climate/hamburgers-cows-green-new-deal.html

———-

The questions: who/what/where/when/why/how?

Alexandra Ocasio Cortez (AOC) a democratic representative from NY proposed the Green New Deal in late 2018 in order to lower greenhouse gas emissions. The article mentions ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by finding alternatives to industrial agriculture; the alternative being “clean meat.” Clean meat is created using cellular agriculture technology, which produces meat that are genetically identical and taste the same as meats that come from animal stem cells grown in a lab.

Impact/Relevance

The topic that this article talks about involves the triple bottom line, which achieves sustainability in the economy, society, and environment. The most powerful environmental impact that the article mentions is that clean meat generates 96% less greenhouse gas emissions, uses 99% less land, and 96% less water. An interesting fact that I read, said that 14% of greenhouse gas emissions come from industrial agriculture, and 9 billion animals are slaughtered in the US every year. The social impact that relates to the topic are that the people who work in slaughterhouses could potentially lose their job, if clean meat technology becomes a thing. Another social impact is that people are feeling forced to change diets; people may feel this way, because they have lived off of the slaughtering of animals their whole lives, and are scared or close-minded to trying alternative meats. The economic impact from this proposition has already been mentioned above with the loss of jobs, but another economic impact is, the increased profit for plant-based companies for their alternative options. The main goal is to find a way to sustainably produce food that meets the food security of the nation.

Question posed

Being a public health major, I question the health impacts of alternative options. My question while reading the articles was, what are the possible health outcomes that are a result of the clean meat technology presented? According to the World Cancer Research Fund, limiting the consumption of red meats lowers the risk of cancer. At the same time, the article found that nutritional deficiencies would increase, specifically protein. Yes, there are alternative ways to get protein in one’s diet, like the consumption of lentils, quinoa, nuts, and dark greens to name a few, but studies have shown that even eating those foods, the body would still be in deficiency.

Why I chose this article?

I decided to choose this article to do my news report on, because I am interested in nutrition and the health outcomes that come from healthy eating. I found this topic interesting, because I decided to go vegan last year for about 6 months, and really learned a lot. Unfortunately, I stopped due to not having the time to meal plan. Although, I am no longer vegan, I try to eat only white meats and reduce my consumption of dark meats. I also try to reduce the amount of animal products I eat in general.