Shays’ Rebellion and the Constitutional Convention

By: Brooke Diemart

Unlike my first post, this is not my first rodeo looking into the Digital Public Library of America. However, I did find this particular task a little daunting since I had checked out other sites and there was so much. DPLA seemed to be easier to access information. Upon getting that information, I had looked at a couple things during this time period that related to the Revolution. I scrolled down and saw Shays’ Rebellion. This actually was very enticing to me because once it was mentioned in class from our reading of The Contrast (which I enjoyed very much – one of my favorite readings in class), I was drawn to it! 

A portrait of Major General Benjamin Lincoln, a supporter of the Constitution who led a militia to suppress Shays’ Rebellion.

This illustration of Benjamin Lincoln pulled me in. So, I want to mention what I saw in the photo that intrigued me. To the left of Lincoln in the photo (right to Lincoln), it is very small, but there are soldiers who are holding up an American flag. It almost looks as if they are celebrating. I cannot help but notice the cannon that Lincoln is leaning on in the picture. He has a piece of blank paper in his hand and (I think) a glove in his other. He stands wearing a uniform that has stars at the top, representing America. I would also say that he is standing like he is distinguished. He has his arm on his hip (which seems to me confident) and his face slightly turned. That is not to say he is just posing because he very well could be.  He has what seems to be a satchel around his arm swinging around to his side and a sword right in front of it.  At the bottom of the picture it states, “Engraved by J.R. Smith / Major General Benjamin Lincoln/ Of the Revolutionary Army of the United States, / President of the Cincinnati of the State of Massachusetts…”. This is all I could really get from it since the type face is cursive and very hard to read. 

I, a natural curious being, wanted to find out more about him. Why put these pieces particularly inside the illustration? So, I went to do research. Born on January 24, 1733, he was a Major General and very important to the Revolutionary War. This explains the American Flag and soldiers. It also explains the cannons! He played a role in Shays’ Rebellion too. Just for short review, in New England, farmers and merchants were trying to keep their businesses maintained without European trade or credit lines. In August 1786, an uprising was led by Daniel Shays in Massachusetts started from the rise of tension and lasted until 1787. This uprising was for what they thought was an oppressive tax system, political corruption, and the focus on the elites that were ignoring the issues of the lower class. Benjamin Lincoln plays a role in this, because in 1787, he led a force of militia to put an end to these uprisings. 

This rebellion was one of the major influences for the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that took place from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia.

An illustration of the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

This is another image/illustration I was looking at. This illustration had a bunch of men, who were delegates helping ratify the constitution. At the table are the Committee of Detail. They were in charge of drafting. I believe that it is George Washington who is standing and holding his hand up to the crowd of delegates. This was to decide how America was governed and for the revising of the Constitution. Benjamin Lincoln had been chosen to be a delegate here and vote to ratify the Constitution (thanks to his stance in the rebellion). Overall, this entire meeting helped shape the United States Constitution! I found all this super interesting and important to know! I have gained a better understanding of both Shays’ Rebellion and the Constitutional Convention. 

Hessian Artifacts from the Revolutionary War

by Gabi Loue

Researching artifacts on an online database is a different experience than researching scholarly articles (the method of library searching I am most familiar with as an English major) or even visiting/viewing artifacts physically in a museum. My primary research database for this endeavor was the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA), which allowed me to limit my search results to the designated time period of the class and research by key phrases or terms. For this project, I was particularly interested in the role the Hessians played in the Revolutionary War, having first encountered that word in Royall Tyler’s The Contrast, where an American servant describes another’s speech as “like the Hessians” (822). I had never previously looked into the Hessians before, nor did we discuss much about them in class, so I was curious to learn more, with my knowledge being so limited. After observing a few search results, however, I found it necessary to conduct a slight bit of background research on the group (German soldiers recruited by the British Army to fight the colonies, most notably known for their defeat at the Battle of Trenton) before delving back into the artifacts. 

Hessian Miter Cap

Two particular artifacts drew my attention and helped me cultivate a better understanding of the Hessian army, and the role they had and life they led during the Revolutionary War. The first artifact is a Hessian Miter Cap, a metal and wool head covering made in 1775, complete with an emblem of the Hessian lion. Specifically, the cap is from the Fusilier Regiment von Knyphausen, a light infantry regiment whose cap specifically designated their job and regiment. Following an external link from DPLA, I could look at images from all angles (provided by the National Museum of American History) and found the intricacy of the engravings very interesting to observe. I’m curious as to how these were made and if they were suitable for protection during a battle. On the subject of battles, another interesting artifact of note I found was a document officially titled “Plan der affaire zu Trenton” (Plan of the Affair at Trenton), the most significant battle the Hessians were involved in (and subsequently defeated at). This is a paper document, so it’s faded and some of the writing is difficult to make out, although thankfully I was led to an external source that described it and restated what was written in sprawling script on the right hand side. The document outlines the designation of certain artillery and troops (represented by red and blue) as well as offers a somewhat detailed drawing of the layout. It’s an interesting document to witness and I’m astonished how it’s been preserved on paper, especially with the overwhelming reliance on technology and computers in the modern day.

Plan der affaire zu Trenton, welche den 26ton Decembe, 1776, vorgefallen = [Plan of the affair at Trenton, which occurred on the 26th of December, 1776]

A Deep Dive into the Digital Archives

by Sarah Savage

Upon my brainstorming session for the second blog post assignment this semester, I found that I struggled in narrowing down my interests into a concise post. But after browsing the archives for a little, I found that something I wanted to research further and learn more about was the Battle at Valley Forge. I think it is safe to say that we are all probably somewhat familiar with the broader details regarding this battle, like that it was fought from 1777-1778 and was commanded by General George Washington. Since it is such a well-known battle of the American revolution, I figured that I should know more about it (at least to the point where I know vaguely what I am talking about if the topic were ever to arise in dinner conversation, perhaps).

So I conducted some preliminary research on the battle, just so I was familiar with the basics. If Wikipedia is as reliable as I would like to believe it is, then this battle was actually the third of eight winter encampments of the continental army during the years of the war. Additionally, the battle has been credited with being the “Birthplace of the American Army” because it was believed to be the first battle where the continental army formed a strong, concise unit and fought as a whole. Valley Forge is located around twenty-five miles outside of Philadelphia, and George Washington made the decision to camp there for that very reason-to be close to the British who were stationed in Philadelphia. I was in search of an artifact from this battle that really captured this unity and camaraderie that Valley Forge was best known for, and eventually I found myself browsing around the paintings of Valley Forge on the “Digital Public Library of America” database. I was pleased to discover that there were, in fact, several notable paintings from this battle, so I decided to choose the two that I liked best.

The first painting I decided to focus on was William T. Trego’s oil on canvas entitled “The March to Valley Forge.” Upon inspection of this painting, I realized that the faces of Trego’s soldiers are nowhere near happy and absolutely did not capture this unified front that we know of now. Then I thought, “well duh, I don’t think I would be too happy either in temperatures less than ten degrees…” I found out that Trego’s inspiration for the depressing hues and faces of his painting was actually a quote from Washington Irving’s “Life of George Washington” which read: “Sad and dreary was the march to Valley Forge.”

Trego: The March to Valley Forge

The second artifact that I found interesting was actually a map of the encampment at Valley Forge that was drawn in 1778. This map was difficult to decipher in my opinion because I had trouble reading the key. There was a number of strange symbols that I could not quite understand, but this made it even more interesting in a way. Click the link and let me know if you can understand it!

 

Tea Tax Tempest

by Caden Albert

I chose an image from the during the American Revolution regarding the taxation of America colonists. I really didn’t know what to expect, but this is one of the first images that I found that wasn’t a document or letter of some sort. I was shocked to see this image due to the layers of detail within it.

First, it seems that an angel is projecting an image of a revolutionary battle on a sheet or window covering. This was INSANE to me because how did the artist think of this? Projecting an image onto something else certainly isn’t something from this time, but it’s found clear as day here. It really could be a coincidence that an angel is providing a lens for the future, but it still was pretty damn cool to me.

Secondly, the characters in this room were of such diversity. An angel is the one projecting, two women seem to be discussing the image, a black woman looks upon it scared along side a Native American. This really differed from a lot of the other images that I found at first and definitely different from images that we have seen in class. Interestingly, it looks like there is a Native American man leading the charge at the battle “on screen.”

I couldn’t find anything about it on the website, but the text at the bottom would suggest to me that this was printed in someplace like a newspaper? Some of the language is English, but some other words that are faded at the bottom look like Latin.

Another thing that I found really interesting is the amount of detail found in this drawing. I have to assume it is a drawing because of the lack of color other than the shading and the fact that it was probably printed. To start with the foreground, the two white women look to be of high stature due to their clothing and items that they are holding. I also think the location that they are in is of Roman architecture because of the two huge pillars in the top right corner as well as the drapes and tassel hanging down from the ceiling.

Similarly to a lot of the readings we have done and artwork about Washington, this piece looks like the artist wants to make the American colonists backed by God. The spear, shield, and angel watching over the battle all point to this conclusion. This battle does involve everyone in the colonies and is represented by the black woman and Native American watching over from a distance as well.

I really do think the coolest part of this piece is the projection of the battle on the drapes. To see a technology that didn’t exist until over a century later included in a piece like this is absolutely insane. It does look exactly like a projector because of its ring of light as well as the device the angel is holding. Also, with the rest of the drapes being white and plain, it is clear that this is a live projection.

George Washington’s First Inaugural Address

By: Mallory Berry

My close friend is a Historic Preservation major, here at The College. I have spent plenty of hours sitting beside her, watching her screen while I did my own homework. Seeing her go into different databases, and look up historical documents always amused me, and part of me believed that I would never have to do that same research, as she did every day. However, through her I was able to really appreciate this search for documents.

I started my search for a document that related to the early United States, and quickly became fascinated with the idea of viewing primary documents from that time period. Seeing the cursive-script lined pages brought life to that time period, for me. As an English major, and throughout this class, it has been interesting to read from a printed book; but I think that reading texts as they were written can bring a new perspective to what was said. The careful lines, how the text was organized by the author, coffee-stained pages, and any mistakes crossed out, or notes left in the margin can allow readers to see something very personal, as opposed to Times New Roman on a bleach-white page.

Browsing The Library of Congress’s database, I was able to find a section on Words and Deeds in American History. From there, I searched through, looking for something that felt relevant to our coursework. Dated back to April 30, 1789 shows the written document for George Washington’s inaugural address to Congress and the House of Representatives. Having the opportunity to view the original document, and to be able to read through his thought process while writing was extremely interesting to me. People now see figures like George Washington as stable figures who do not make any mistakes. However, being able to see words scratched out, and marks notating where he wants to add a sentence, or change his word choice was very humanizing.

The formatting of the page is a scanned version of Washington’s journal. The quality of the document is not great, just because of the fact that it is a document from the 18th century, and moving that to a digital format can also affect the way in which it looks. Reading the document was a little difficult, with the smudged letters, and being able to see the pen strokes from the previous page bleeding through. Reading the cursive text was not incredibly difficult for me, but all of the other marks on the page did slow me down in reading it. On the other hand, had this page been typed up, and placed in front of me, I do believe that it would be significantly easier to read than how Washington wrote it. If this was reproduced to be printed, I would hope that all of the marks Washington made would be maintained, or put in a footnote– because I think that there is great power in the words that he chose to use, and how exactly he got to that point.

With Washington being a historical figure that we often reference throughout this course, but have not had the chance to examine his writing, I thought that this would be a perfect document to examine. I really enjoyed looking for it, and encourage anyone looking for some historical reading to check out the 12 pages of Washington’s writing.

George Washington’s first inaugural address, 30 April 1789.
(George Washington Papers)

https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage

Middleton Place

by Payton Waters

For my blog post, I chose to visit Middleton Place. Middleton Place is a plantation that was originally owned by the Williams family. After the original owner, John Williams passed away, the plantation was passed down to his daughter Mary Williams. Williams then married a man by the name of Henry Middleton which consequently led to the name change of the estate. The Middleton family were avid supporters of the Confederacy and they played major roles in the founding of the United States of America. The original main estate and north flanker were burned down during the Civil War, leaving only one building standing. Today, the one remaining house is staged with all original furniture, artwork, decor, and more that belonged to the Middleton family.

We have often discussed the vital role that Christianity and God played for many African Americans during this time period. Another structure that survived the Civil War was the Spring House and plantation chapel. The building was originally built in 1741 but the chapel was added in 1851 by Williams Middleton and his wife, Susan Pringle Smith. The idea for the chapel was encouraged by Susan because of her experience growing up on plantations with chapels for enslaved individuals. The actual construction is presumed to have been done by Williams’ three main slave carpenters, Billy, Henley, and William. The Spring House is perched atop a hill with the chapel on the upper floor. The chapel is located right along the edge of Mill Pond. The view of the water adds a sense of serenity to the already spiritual space.

The chapel itself was very small. It was about two-thirds the size of our classroom. There was a small cross placed above the fireplace, with two rows of three benches each facing it. This struck me because it is assumed that there were upwards of 800 slaves that resided on the Middleton plantation. In addition, the chapel was open for use for any white person living or visiting the plantation as well. While the slaves made up the overwhelming majority of the population at the estate, they still were only given a very small space to dedicate to their worship.

This space was dedicated to religious lessons, Sunday services, baptisms, marriages, confirmations, and funerals. Oftentimes, slaves from other plantations would come and get married in the Middleton’s chapel. These marriages would be recognized by Middleton Place and other plantations but they were not technically recognized by the South Carolina government.

Overall, the experience reaffirmed the idea that spirtuality was one of the main focuses of African American culture during slavery. It was clear that this particular chapel, no matter the size, was important to those that resided at Middleton Place and even those that were on other plantations. This chapel seemed to be one of the only places on the plantation that the slaves were able to exercise the same rights that their white owners were able to have wherever they pleased.

 

Slavery and the Revolution from the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon

By: Dahlia Watson

Today I visited the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon on East Bay Street. The Architecture of the building was magnificent, representing a Georgian-Palladian design which showcased the significant wealth of its original owner. The large and informative posters on the top floor really captivated my attention. They provided information about historically significant Charlestians such as Rebecca Motte, remembered as a revolutionary war hero, and Benjamin Boseman, the first African-American Postmaster in Charleston. Additionally, there was a lot of information relating to the Transatlantic Slave Trade, positioning the Old Exchange building as a common slave auction in the heart of Charleston. I was extremely interested in a display box (although I wasn’t able to get a picture of it, sorry!!) which contained artifacts of enslaved persons. Within this box there were small metal tags which were attached to the enslaved people to indicate who they belonged to. Along with small metal tags that were indicative of a “free colored.” I was astonished to discover that free blacks lived on the Charleston peninsula and that even though they were free they still had to wear a little metal tag, similar to a dog tag, to indicate that they were not owned by other human beings. Also within this display box, two small rusted metal chains and a ovular metal band reveal the cruelties faced by enslaved persons in Charleston. The description of the ovular metal band denoted it as “slave collar” which was used as a torturing device while functioning to reveal which slaves were seen as dangerous or at risk for an escape. 

I have seen photos and artifacts like this before but it never ceases to amaze me. I am blown away by the immense degradation of one race for the complete comfort and luxury of another. The dingy, rusted metal chains inside of the beautifully exquisite architecture provides a very subtle clue on how early Charlestians became so wealthy and how they were able to sustain resources to fund the Revolutionary War. Seeing these artifacts made me very curious to know how enslaved persons were feeling during the time of the Revolutionary War and if they were aware that their labor was contributing to a war to keep them enslaved. Additionally, I was thinking about our discussion in class yesterday about Thomas Jefferson. What should we do with this history? Yes, as interesting as it was to see these artifacts on display and walk through the walls of where some of the most important decisions relating to the state of South Carolina were made, it all still feels a little too glorified. While the only thing we can do with history is study it to prevent it from occurring again, I feel as if these displays almost serve to desensitize our understanding of slavery in South Carolina. Perhaps it’s the portraits and letters written to, for, and about white men that hang and linger over these metal torture devices, unfit for our pets, but used on human beings. Perhaps it’s the busy, rambunctious tourists filing in and out, quickly gazing at human slave collars and casually scrolling to the next contextual piece in attempt to understand what that contorted piece of metal was. While artifacts provide tangible evidence of our troubling past, literature provides detailed and reflective accounts of the sentiments and perspectives of people from the past. Until the limited amount of African American literature that we have (due to laws preventing slaves to learn how to read and write) finds a home on modern syllabi this history of our past will continue to stay locked up, on display and separated from our comprehension.

 

Visiting the Charleston Museum

The Charleston Museum is full of wonderful history dating back to the beginning of time. Nevertheless, for the purpose of this blog, I spent a lot of time in the American Revolution exhibit: the late 1700s, and the early 1800s.

What struck me so much about the American Revolution in the Americas is just how much of an impact it had on not only South Carolina, but also African Americans and the indigenous people. I learned some interesting facts about where Charleston stood at the time of the Revolution’s start. It was the “fourth largest city”: a place of trade, especially cotton, and slavery. However, the Lowcountry and Backcountry had been divided by those who supported the British and those who did not. Because of this, the two countries became hostile towards each other. There were so many different people, and most of them supported either the Crown, Loyalists, the patriots, or the Whigs.

What really struck me was how South Carolina, especially Charleston, was put under siege during the Revolution–almost as bad as the Civil War, which was another exhibit I looked at. Charleston was captured and many people were either enslaved or taken hostage. The British stayed in Charleston until the end of the war. It was just incredible learning how strong the civilians stayed during this time, because they believed they could gain their independence. What proved that to them was the Battle of Sullivan’s Island. The British attacked Fort Moultrie and came ashore to spread even more death and destruction inland. However, despite the fort not being finished, it still withstood the cannon fire rather well, allowing for a nice shield for the American troops. Many were killed, yes, but the Americans did not give up, and eventually, the British troops pulled back. The exhibit said that it was that battle where Americans knew they had a chance in the war. In my opinion, I think it was a turning point for it.

The aftermath of the war was devastating, especially on the Native Americans. Since we’ve been talking a lot about the natives in class, I decided to spend some ample time studying this part of the exhibit. Starting from the year 1685 to the year 1790, the native population dropped drastically–especially at the end of the war. Between 1715 and 1790, over 4,000 Native Americans lost their homes as more slaves started to move into the county. At the end of the war, people pushed their enslaved territories further inland, which put pressure on the native tribes. The exhibit said that these invasions caused a lot of conflict and violence, but at the end of the day, the settlers won. Many Native Americans were either killed or converted. The Revolutionary War caused them to lose their identities. This was both fascinating and disturbing to me.

I ended my exploration on the tale of Francis Marion, a well-known soldier during the Revolutionary times. I never knew that he gained his military expertise by fighting against the Cherokee. They took their environment and terrain into consideration, and Marion learned from that to assist him in his famous “The British are coming!” run. Marion was good with stealth and surprise attacks. It was much like a fox, so that was why he was given the nickname the “Swamp Fox” after he died.

Overall, I really enjoyed my visit to the museum. I learned a lot about South Carolina and how big of a role it played in the Revolutionary War. At the end of the day, people knew the state by its role in trade and cotton, and its part at the Battle of Sullivan’s Island. If the Americans had not won that battle, I feel that our history would be very different.

Heyward-Washington House

By: Grace Nichols

The Heyward-Washington House, built in the early 1770s was once lived in by founding fathers, but now is a house museum full of Charleston artifacts. These artifacts, mainly high style furniture from the late 18th century reflect the material culture of Charleston elite. The tour focused on the patriots and founding fathers who stayed in the house. Thomas Heyward Jr., one of the youngest men to sign the Declaration of Independence lived in the house after his father built it for him. Heyward also participated in the Siege of Charleston against the British and was exiled to St. Augustine for a yearafterwards. The house itself was an extra downtown home for Heyward as many rich plantation owners lived on their plantations full time and had another central downtown home for the convince of entertaining and conducting business. With that purpose in mind, many patriots met in the home including George Washington, who stayed there for a small period when visiting Charleston.

Bookcase The house’s most grand piece of furniture was a library bookcase, considered to be “a masterpiece of its time,” and one of the best examples of early American furniture. This Holmes bookcase was made by Martin Pfeninger using expensive Mahogany and Cyprus wood native to Charleston. With ornate German-esc curvatures and fixtures such as the moveable flowers on top the piece was extremely expensive then and solidified the elite status of the owner.

Another piece of furniture that does not “priceless” stature of the bookcase, but caught my attention was a traveling dresser. At first glance, this dresser looks like a normal one, but it breaks off into 3 separate pieces with handles on the sides that turn the dresser into a traveling trunk. For the purposes of traveling back and forth between a plantation house and a downtown home this piece of furniture works perfectly for rich Charlestonians.

Dresser and Suitcase Trunk

One discrepancy I had with the tour relates to our class discussion we had on Thursday. For my discussion post I relayed how important it is to remember history accurately. To educate history properly, people and certain events should not be glorified, but rather the context must be laid out in a way that also condemns any wrong doings. The Heyward-Washington House tour failed to properly communicate the immense role Charleston had in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. While they did mention slavery, it was not a point they highlighted very much. They focused more on the material culture and figures important to the house’s history (so Heyward, Washington, and two early feminist daughters in the family). It felt that they were trying to lean away from the darker parts of history and highlight figures that made the house’s history more positive.

Conversely, a few weeks ago I went to the Edmondson-Alston House (a house museum in Charleston) for another class, and there they made sure to bring up the role that slave labor played in the house’s history. There, they immediately explained that the house was built using slave labor, something not mentioned at the Heyward-Washington house, but I can only assume that slave labor was used to build the house. They also gave some examples of horrible things the slaves had to do there, and really got into Charleston’s role in the slave trade which included how the slave badge system worked in Charleston. At the Edmondson-Alston House they also had a list of all the known names of slaves that worked in the house. This is the right way to do it, explaining the horrible things rather than glossing over so we can remember history accurately and honoring the people who were harmed. Overall, I did enjoy seeing the Heyward-Washington House. It had very beautiful things inside that showed the wealth of some 18th century people, but I had issues with the lack of talking about the role enslaved people played.

Oh, That’s What That Building is! A Museum!

By: Sarah Savage

After reading the potential museum options for this blog post assignment, I found myself gravitating towards the Old Exchange and Provost’s Dungeon. I can’t explain why I chose this one really, perhaps because I had never heard of it before, or maybe even because the word “dungeon” piqued my interest. Either way, I made my decision, and punched 122 East Bay Street into my GPS and I was on my way. When Siri informed me that I had arrived at my destination, I was surprised to discover that I was actually familiar with the building that was the Old Exchange. I had passed by it several times in the four years that I have lived in Charleston, but never knew what it was. The building had always intrigued me, but it is right smack dab in the middle of tourist central, so I suppose that’s why I never investigated further. Once I walked up the grand steps, I was greeted by a man in an authentic colonial costume. I thought to myself, “Damn, I like this place already.” Once inside, my spirits were once again lifted when I spoke to the lovely elderly lady behind the counter (also dressed in colonial garb) and she informed me that there was a student discount. Score! Once I started walking around the museum, I couldn’t help but think to myself that there was a lot of open or empty space that was not being utilized. Maybe this was just an OCD observation, but I felt as though there was so much more room for other displays. There were several portraits on the walls, including descriptions which I enjoyed reading. Additionally, I loved the fact that the museum’s artifacts and displays were tailored around Charleston itself. We were given pictures of Washington in Charleston, as well as a brief biography of Francis Marion. Perhaps the most interesting display that I came across in the entire museum was the one that described the lives of women during the eighteenth century. Don’t get me wrong, battle history is always interesting, as well as the words of Jefferson and Franklin, but what about the women? There are unfortunately not many women who rose to notable status during this time, because someone had to be at home making dinner and raising the children. And I think that the part that women played in this time period is just as historically important as any other aspect of the American Revolution. The two displays were titled “Women in Public Life” and “Private and Family Life”. I found this display both intriguing as well as important because it is so often overlooked. The first sentence really set the tone for me: “Women’s lives within the public realm were heavily regulated both culturally and legally.” I was so interested in this text because it showed that women really did not have any shred of agency. I was shocked, however, to discover that the state of South Carolina “had one of the highest rates of female property ownership in the colonies.” I can’t say that I expected this from the state of South Carolina, but I am certainly impressed nonetheless. My favorite part of this display, however, were the words of colonial women taken from their own journals. These women relay their stresses and fatigues with their personal and privatized lives, and these quotes make for an excellent primary source.